Algorithmic Stablecoins Explained (2025): How They Work, Examples, and Key Risks

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Crypto investments carry risks, including loss of capital. Always do your own research or consult a licensed advisor before investing.

Algorithmic Stablecoins: How They Work, Examples, and Risks

Algorithmic stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that use algorithms instead of collateral to maintain price stability, automatically expanding or contracting token supply to keep their value close to a fixed peg (usually $1).

Key Takeaways

• Algorithmic stablecoins aim to stay pegged to fiat currencies without holding reserves.
  
• They rely on on-chain algorithms and incentives to adjust supply and demand.
  
• Examples include Ampleforth (AMPL), Frax (FRAX), and TerraUSD (UST).
  
• While innovative, they can collapse rapidly if confidence drops as seen with Terra Luna.
  
• Hybrid models like Frax now mix partial collateral and algorithms for better stability.
  

What Are Algorithmic Stablecoins?

Algorithmic stablecoins are a class of stablecoins designed to maintain a fixed value typically pegged to the U.S. dollar without being backed by collateral such as fiat or crypto reserves.

Instead, they use smart contracts and mathematical formulas that automatically regulate token supply based on market conditions.

When the price rises above $1, new coins are minted. When it falls below $1, the system burns or removes coins from circulation.

This makes algorithmic stablecoins a type of self-regulating, decentralized monetary system similar to an automated central bank operating entirely on-chain.

How Do Algorithmic Stablecoins Work?

Algorithmic stablecoins maintain stability through three main models that manage supply and demand differently.

1. Rebase Model

In a rebase model, the supply of tokens in every wallet automatically expands or contracts daily depending on price deviation from the peg.

• Example: Ampleforth (AMPL) increases total supply when its price exceeds $1 and reduces it when below.
  
• Effect: Holders maintain the same percentage of supply, but the number of tokens changes.
  

2. Seigniorage Model

In seigniorage-based systems, two or more tokens interact:

• The stablecoin (e.g., UST) and a governance or bond token (e.g., LUNA).
  
• When the stablecoin price drops, users can burn it for governance tokens, reducing supply.
  
• When it rises, they can mint more stablecoins, increasing supply.
  

This model mimics how a central bank issues and buys back currency but algorithmically.

3. Fractional Algorithmic Model

This hybrid approach uses partial collateralization plus algorithmic adjustments.

• Example: Frax (FRAX) maintains part of its value with USDC reserves and part via algorithmic control.
  
• Advantage: More stability during volatility, as collateral buffers confidence loss.
  

Popular Algorithmic Stablecoins List (2025)

How Algorithmic Stablecoins Maintain Their Peg

The goal is simple: keep the price near $1 using autonomous incentives.

1. When the price is above $1:
   
   • The protocol mints new tokens.
     
   • Users sell them for profit, increasing supply and pushing price down.
     
     
2. When the price is below $1:
   
   • The protocol burns tokens or issues bond-like assets.
     
   • Reduced supply lifts price back toward $1.
     

However, this system works only if users believe it will.

When confidence falls, nobody buys the discounted tokens, triggering a feedback loop of collapse.

Algorithmic Stablecoin vs Stablecoin: Key Differences Explained

Algorithmic stablecoins push decentralization to the limit, but they sacrifice reliability and investor protection to do so.

Risks and Concerns When Considering Algorithmic Stablecoins

Algorithmic stablecoins are among the most innovative yet fragile structures in DeFi.

1. Technical Risks

Smart contract vulnerabilities or oracle failures can disrupt peg mechanisms.

2. Economic Risks

Their stability relies on market confidence. If users stop believing the peg will hold, demand vanishes, and a death spiral begins.

3. Psychological Risks

Reflexive feedback loops amplify panic: when the price drops, people rush to sell, worsening the situation.

4. Regulatory Risks

After the Terra Luna collapse, regulators (e.g., the EU under MiCA) scrutinize algorithmic stablecoins as potential systemic threats. Many may require full collateralization or registration to operate in Europe.

Key Concern: Algorithmic stablecoins can collapse overnight if trust or liquidity disappears, unlike fiat-backed coins, which can be redeemed directly.

The Terra Luna Algorithmic Stablecoin Collapse: Lessons Learned

In May 2022, TerraUSD (UST), once valued over $18 billion, collapsed alongside its sister token LUNA, wiping out over $40 billion in market value.

How It Worked

UST stayed pegged by allowing users to exchange $1 worth of LUNA for 1 UST and vice versa.

When UST lost its peg, users minted excessive LUNA to restore parity, but this hyperinflated LUNA instead, destroying both tokens’ value.

Key Lessons

• Circular dependencies are inherently unstable.
  
• Overconfidence and yield incentives (e.g., Anchor’s 20% APY) masked systemic risk.
  
• Future models must include real reserves or circuit breakers to prevent runaway minting.
  

The Evolution of Algorithmic Stablecoins (2017–2025)

• 2017–2019: Early experiments like Basis Cash and CarbonUSD introduced seigniorage mechanics.
  
• 2020–2021: Projects like Ampleforth and TerraUSD gained traction, promising decentralized stability.
  
• 2022: The Terra collapse shook global confidence in algorithmic designs.
  
• 2023–2025: Hybrid models like Frax and USDD emerged, combining collateral buffers with algorithms.
  

Algorithmic stablecoins are now evolving into semi-collateralized systems that trade pure decentralization for practical resilience.

Market Snapshot: Stablecoins by Model (October 2025)

Source: CoinMarketCap, October 2025

How to Store Algorithmic Stablecoins Safely

If you choose to hold algorithmic stablecoins, non-custodial storage is essential.

Custodial platforms can freeze assets or fail during market shocks.

With Bleap’s MPC non-custodial wallet, you can:

• Securely hold or swap fiat-backed stablecoins.
  
• Keep full control of your private keys (Bleap cannot access your funds).
  
• Earn yields transparently on-chain.
  
• Spend or convert instantly with your free Mastercard and 2% cashback.
  

👉 Explore Bleap’s non-custodial wallet →

The Future of Algorithmic Stablecoins

The future may belong to hybrid designs, part algorithmic, part collateralized.

As DeFi matures, innovation is moving toward sustainability over ideology.

Expect:

• Stronger risk controls built into smart contracts.
  
• On-chain proof-of-reserves.
  
• Integration with regulated DeFi systems compliant with MiCA.
  
• Greater synergy between non-custodial wallets and decentralized yield protocols.
  

Algorithmic stablecoins may never fully replace fiat-backed models, but they continue to inspire progress toward decentralized money.

FAQ About Algorithmic Stablecoins

What are algorithmic stablecoins?

They are cryptocurrencies that maintain a stable price using algorithms and smart contracts instead of fiat or crypto collateral.

How do algorithmic stablecoins maintain their peg?

By automatically increasing or decreasing supply based on price deviations from the target value (usually $1).

Are algorithmic stablecoins safe?

They are high-risk experimental assets. When market confidence drops, they can de-peg or collapse entirely.

What are examples of algorithmic stablecoins?

Ampleforth (AMPL), Frax (FRAX), USDD, and the collapsed TerraUSD (UST).

What is the difference between algorithmic and fiat-backed stablecoins?

Fiat-backed stablecoins hold real reserves like USD in banks. Algorithmic stablecoins rely solely on on-chain rules and user incentives.

What is a concern when considering algorithmic stablecoins?

Their stability depends entirely on market trust and liquidity. If confidence fails, the system can spiral into collapse.

Conclusion

Algorithmic stablecoins represent one of DeFi’s boldest experiments: programmable, decentralized money without collateral.

Their failures, especially Terra Luna, revealed serious flaws but also drove innovation toward more resilient hybrid designs.

For users exploring stablecoin options, security and self-custody are paramount.

With Bleap’s on-chain account, you can hold, spend, and earn with stablecoins safely, all under your control.

👉 Protect your stablecoins with Bleap today → Get started securely